Sanarchive:Help desk: Difference between revisions

(12 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)

Line 29:

</div>

}}

== Reappointment of Non-Elected Bureaucrats [[User:Egzoz]] ==

This heading has been opened for [[User:Egzoz]], who has not been elected before. I kindly request your participation.

Thanks. [[User:Vincent Vega|Vincent Vega]] ([[User talk:Vincent Vega|talk]]) 20:16, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

:{{Oppose}} I insist that this man has been sitting idle since this place opened, and I strongly oppose granting him bureaucratic authority; such authority must be earned through hard work. [[User:Pumpkin|Pumpkin]] ([[User talk:Pumpkin|talk]]) 20:19, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

:{{Support}} Everyone deserves a second chance. I am confident that they will work for Sanarchive when selected. [[User:Pongo|Pongo]] ([[User talk:Pongo|talk]]) 20:27, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

:{{Oppose}} The bureaucrat should be dismissed for failing to exercise his authority and should reapply only after making sufficient contributions. [[User:Aurelianus|Aurelianus]] ([[User talk:Aurelianus|talk]]) 20:38, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

:{{Oppose}} by joining the above writings [[User:ParsecWalker|ParsecWalker]] ([[User talk:ParsecWalker|talk]]) 20:56, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

:{{Oppose}} I do not support it in any way; global powers should be taken away immediately. [[User:Aleain|Aleain]] ([[User talk:Aleain|talk]]) 21:08, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

:{{Oppose}} There is nothing more shameful than taking authority from where you sit. Those who vote have said everything that needs to be said, and I see no need to say more. [[User:McFly|McFly]] ([[User talk:McFly|talk]]) 21:18, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

:{{Oppose}} It's ridiculous to open the vote for someone who didn't put in the work. [[User:MarcellusR|MarcellusR]] ([[User talk:MarcellusR|talk]]) 22:25, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

:{{Oppose}} Too much time has passed for this vote; it should be closed as unsuccessful without causing any harm to the person. [[User:Cedric|Cedric]] ([[User talk:Cedric|talk]]) 22:29, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

{{Oppose}} I also oppose granting this user bureaucratic authority at this time. I believe that such a high level of responsibility should be earned through consistent activity and a proven track record of contributions to the site. Since the candidate has not yet demonstrated sufficient involvement or hard work for Sanarchive, I do not support this nomination.[[User:Webro jack|Webro jack]] ([[User talk:Webro jack|talk]]) 20:58, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 </div>
 }}
+== Reappointment of Non-Elected Bureaucrats [[User:Egzoz]] ==
+This heading has been opened for [[User:Egzoz]], who has not been elected before. I kindly request your participation.
+Thanks. [[User:Vincent Vega|Vincent Vega]] ([[User talk:Vincent Vega|talk]]) 20:16, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
+:{{Oppose}} I insist that this man has been sitting idle since this place opened, and I strongly oppose granting him bureaucratic authority; such authority must be earned through hard work. [[User:Pumpkin|Pumpkin]] ([[User talk:Pumpkin|talk]]) 20:19, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
+:{{Support}} Everyone deserves a second chance. I am confident that they will work for Sanarchive when selected. [[User:Pongo|Pongo]] ([[User talk:Pongo|talk]]) 20:27, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
+:{{Oppose}} The bureaucrat should be dismissed for failing to exercise his authority and should reapply only after making sufficient contributions. [[User:Aurelianus|Aurelianus]] ([[User talk:Aurelianus|talk]]) 20:38, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
+:{{Oppose}} by joining the above writings [[User:ParsecWalker|ParsecWalker]] ([[User talk:ParsecWalker|talk]]) 20:56, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
+:{{Oppose}} I do not support it in any way; global powers should be taken away immediately. [[User:Aleain|Aleain]] ([[User talk:Aleain|talk]]) 21:08, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
+:{{Oppose}} There is nothing more shameful than taking authority from where you sit. Those who vote have said everything that needs to be said, and I see no need to say more. [[User:McFly|McFly]] ([[User talk:McFly|talk]]) 21:18, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
+:{{Oppose}} It's ridiculous to open the vote for someone who didn't put in the work. [[User:MarcellusR|MarcellusR]] ([[User talk:MarcellusR|talk]]) 22:25, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
+:{{Oppose}} Too much time has passed for this vote; it should be closed as unsuccessful without causing any harm to the person. [[User:Cedric|Cedric]] ([[User talk:Cedric|talk]]) 22:29, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
+{{Oppose}} I also oppose granting this user bureaucratic authority at this time. I believe that such a high level of responsibility should be earned through consistent activity and a proven track record of contributions to the site. Since the candidate has not yet demonstrated sufficient involvement or hard work for Sanarchive, I do not support this nomination.[[User:Webro jack|Webro jack]] ([[User talk:Webro jack|talk]]) 20:58, 18 January 2026 (UTC)