Sanarchive:Help desk: Difference between revisions

(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)

Line 40:

:{{Oppose}} The bureaucrat should be dismissed for failing to exercise his authority and should reapply only after making sufficient contributions. [[User:Aurelianus|Aurelianus]] ([[User talk:Aurelianus|talk]]) 20:38, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

:{{Oppose}} by joining the above writings [[User:ParsecWalker|ParsecWalker]] ([[User talk:ParsecWalker|talk]]) 20:56, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

:{{Oppose}} I do not support it in any way; global powers should be taken away immediately. [[User:Aleain|Aleain]] ([[User talk:Aleain|talk]]) 21:08, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

:{{Oppose}} There is nothing more shameful than taking authority from where you sit. Those who vote have said everything that needs to be said, and I see no need to say more. [[User:McFly|McFly]] ([[User talk:McFly|talk]]) 21:18, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

:{{Oppose}} It's ridiculous to open the vote for someone who didn't put in the work. [[User:MarcellusR|MarcellusR]] ([[User talk:MarcellusR|talk]]) 22:25, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

:{{Oppose}} Too much time has passed for this vote; it should be closed as unsuccessful without causing any harm to the person. [[User:Cedric|Cedric]] ([[User talk:Cedric|talk]]) 22:29, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

{{Oppose}} I also oppose granting this user bureaucratic authority at this time. I believe that such a high level of responsibility should be earned through consistent activity and a proven track record of contributions to the site. Since the candidate has not yet demonstrated sufficient involvement or hard work for Sanarchive, I do not support this nomination.[[User:Webro jack|Webro jack]] ([[User talk:Webro jack|talk]]) 20:58, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

@@ Line 40: / Line 40: @@
 :{{Oppose}} The bureaucrat should be dismissed for failing to exercise his authority and should reapply only after making sufficient contributions. [[User:Aurelianus|Aurelianus]] ([[User talk:Aurelianus|talk]]) 20:38, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
 :{{Oppose}} by joining the above writings [[User:ParsecWalker|ParsecWalker]] ([[User talk:ParsecWalker|talk]]) 20:56, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
+:{{Oppose}} I do not support it in any way; global powers should be taken away immediately. [[User:Aleain|Aleain]] ([[User talk:Aleain|talk]]) 21:08, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
+:{{Oppose}} There is nothing more shameful than taking authority from where you sit. Those who vote have said everything that needs to be said, and I see no need to say more. [[User:McFly|McFly]] ([[User talk:McFly|talk]]) 21:18, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
+:{{Oppose}} It's ridiculous to open the vote for someone who didn't put in the work. [[User:MarcellusR|MarcellusR]] ([[User talk:MarcellusR|talk]]) 22:25, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
+:{{Oppose}} Too much time has passed for this vote; it should be closed as unsuccessful without causing any harm to the person. [[User:Cedric|Cedric]] ([[User talk:Cedric|talk]]) 22:29, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
 {{Oppose}} I also oppose granting this user bureaucratic authority at this time. I believe that such a high level of responsibility should be earned through consistent activity and a proven track record of contributions to the site. Since the candidate has not yet demonstrated sufficient involvement or hard work for Sanarchive, I do not support this nomination.[[User:Webro jack|Webro jack]] ([[User talk:Webro jack|talk]]) 20:58, 18 January 2026 (UTC)