Sanarchive:Help desk

Welcome—ask questions about how to use or edit Sanarchive! (Am I in the right place?)

• For other types of questions, use the search box, see the reference desk or Help:Contents. If you have comments about a specific article, use that article's talk page.
• Do not provide your email address or any other contact information. Answers will be provided on this page only.
• If your question is about a Sanarchive article, draft article, or other page on Sanarchive, tell us what it is!
• Check back on this page to see if your question has been answered.
• For real-time help, use our IRC help channel, #Sanarchive-en-help.
• New editors may prefer the Teahouse, a help area for beginners (but please don't ask in both places).

Ask a question

Can't edit this page? ; a volunteer will visit you there shortly!

Assistance for new editors unable to post here

The help desk is currently semi-protected, meaning it can only be edited by registered users who are confirmed or autoconfirmed (accounts that are at least 4 days old with at least 10 edits on English Sanarchive).

However, you can still get direct assistance on your talk page. ; a volunteer will visit you there shortly!

Reappointment of Non-Elected Bureaucrats User:Egzoz

This heading has been opened for User:Egzoz, who has not been elected before. I kindly request your participation.

Thanks. Vincent Vega (talk) 20:16, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Oppose I insist that this man has been sitting idle since this place opened, and I strongly oppose granting him bureaucratic authority; such authority must be earned through hard work. Pumpkin (talk) 20:19, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Support Everyone deserves a second chance. I am confident that they will work for Sanarchive when selected. Pongo (talk) 20:27, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Oppose The bureaucrat should be dismissed for failing to exercise his authority and should reapply only after making sufficient contributions. Aurelianus (talk) 20:38, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Oppose by joining the above writings ParsecWalker (talk) 20:56, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Oppose I do not support it in any way; global powers should be taken away immediately. Aleain (talk) 21:08, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Oppose There is nothing more shameful than taking authority from where you sit. Those who vote have said everything that needs to be said, and I see no need to say more. McFly (talk) 21:18, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Oppose It's ridiculous to open the vote for someone who didn't put in the work. MarcellusR (talk) 22:25, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Oppose Too much time has passed for this vote; it should be closed as unsuccessful without causing any harm to the person. Cedric (talk) 22:29, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

​ Oppose I also oppose granting this user bureaucratic authority at this time. I believe that such a high level of responsibility should be earned through consistent activity and a proven track record of contributions to the site. Since the candidate has not yet demonstrated sufficient involvement or hard work for Sanarchive, I do not support this nomination.Webro jack (talk) 20:58, 18 January 2026 (UTC)